MJ and Me
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03dec/03dec574ed022fe64b6efe7134d614230a999258" alt=""
I'm not a Spider-Man fan, however. I think he's a pretty interesting character, but when my best friend and I both started collecting comics at the same time many years ago, we each chose certain titles that each of us would collect. Exclusively. So if I chose Daredevil (which I did), he didn't buy Daredevil. He could always read mine and sometimes we traded, but for the most part we stuck with those original choices.
I didn't "get" Spider-Man, and I've never much read him since. Nothing against him. Just wasn't in the cards.
But I had read McKeever's A Waiting Place
Like I said, they were good, if not a little slow moving (although that seems to be happening a lot in comics these days; both 4-issue series would've been shoved into an 8-page story in Love Adventures 50 years prior, but that's not much different from how comics were paced then and now).
So I was excited to see that Marvel had greenlighted a new ongoing series. The sales for Mary Jane had been some of the lowest at the company, and it was good to see them trying to make something work.
But then I saw the new title.
Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane.
The first 2 Mary Jane series (Circle of Friends
Now, however, it's Spider-Man and Mary Jane. Together. Swinging on the cover, for crying out loud.
Yes, I realize I haven't read it, and yes, the press release said the title was "tentative", but it still seems to me that comic companies (at least the big ones) still feel that all other genres must tie into super-heroes. I talked about it a bit in this entry, and it's something that I expect to see over and over again. Western? No way. Western with cowboy who can shoot beams out of his eyes? You bet! Romance? Pass. Romance where the character falls in love with a super-hero? I want 5 copies!
I suppose Marvel wants this series to be a stepping stone for people who usually don't read their comics to try this and then buy some others, but I'm not sure what else they'd want to buy (certainly not the other teenage girl comics they have out now -- Arana and X-23). Is Mary Jane the obvious predecessor to Spider-Man? I don't think so.
And this is nothing new from Marvel. Patsy Walker, the main character in many a teen-humor comic from the 50s and early 60s (along with her "friend" Hedy Wolfe) became The Cat (and later Hellcat) in the 70s (and married Son of Satan!). What will become of Millie's red-headed rival, Chili? I suppose she'll flame on like the Human Torch.
Genre can still work in and of itself if it it is only allowed the chance. I'm sure of it.
4 Comments:
I agree with you pretty much on everything but damn that cover good. The sweatdrop on spider-man's head, the whole reversal of the usual positions you would expect.
I agree -- Miyazawa's art is the bee's knees.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
I'm just curious, have you ever revisited this comic? Personally, I really like it and so does my young preteen daughter and her friends. But we're all fans of Spider-Man, which you said you weren't, so perhaps it's just not your thing? I admit it's a bit on the light side, but the art is gorgeous, the characters reasonably nuanced and the stories themselves seem fine examples of the teen romance genre (with a tiny bit of Peter's super-hero identity struggle thrown into the background for good measure). McKeever's a good writer. Anyway if you do ever pick it up, I'd be interested in your take on it! Margie
Post a Comment
<< Home